That time's gone. These results are sorted by most relevant first ranked search. Published in The Atlantic , July 1, University College London. I think his evidence to this point, the story of the writer and the typewriter, was one that gave power to this argument and worked fluidly with the structure of his logic. Our services 2 History homework help Assignment writing help US history homework help Pay for coursework Pay for research paper History homework answers.
Otherwise, you can blame Google. Phil Davis is a publishing consultant specializing in the statistical analysis of citation, readership, publication and survey data. He has a Ph. So Google may not make us thick, but it may force us to recast such text in headline and soundbite chunks, in which the critical intellectual contribution is lost. I agree with that whole-heartedly. On the other hand, I recall spending my pre-Internet days searching an awful lot longer for information.
I guess my point is that sure, that report is true—but it would be yet truer had it taken place two decades ago. Sounds like skimming. Stop, Dave. Will you stop, Dave? I can feel it. I can feel it, too. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages.
I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle. The Web has been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes.
Nicholas Carr The Web has been a godsend to me as a writer. A few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I've .. In a recent essay, the playwright Richard Foreman eloquently described what's at stake. Free Essay: With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from.
For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind. As the media theorist Marshall McLuhan pointed out in the s, media are not just passive channels of information. They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles.
Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski. The more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing. Some of the bloggers I follow have also begun mentioning the phenomenon.
Scott Karp, who writes a blog about online media , recently confessed that he has stopped reading books altogether. Bruce Friedman, who blogs regularly about the use of computers in medicine , also has described how the Internet has altered his mental habits. A pathologist who has long been on the faculty of the University of Michigan Medical School, Friedman elaborated on his comment in a telephone conversation with me.
Even a blog post of more than three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb.
I skim it. And we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition. It is unsurprising that the supercomputer won the match, but it highlights that at some tasks, computers will always dominate, whereas at others, computers will never reach the skill of humans.
I agree however that as the speed of our intake of information has increased, we have become more impatient and often lack the concentration required to process dense information. Do you believe that the advancement in intellectual technology results in more efficiency or inefficiency as humans? We may be able to compute things faster, but as Carr argued, we tend to look for shortcuts, get distracted, and bounce from one topic to the next.
How do you define efficiency? In these introductory paragraphs, Carr effetively balances his own personal experiences and anecdotes with the perspectives of experts in the field and a pertinent study about how computers affect research habits. In his analysis of how Google is changing the way we think, Carr does a good job of illustrating how various technologies throughout human history, like the mechanical clock, have altered the way we perceive and understand the world around us. These examples add a historical authority to his argument and demonstrate that as different technologies are incorporated into societies, they can fundamentally change how humans act and think.
Carr, however extends his argument too far. While I agree that the internet reduces our ability to concentrate and read deeply and thus the way we process information, the notion that Google is slowly rewiring our brain and modes of cognition to become more computer like is a stretch.
Yet, Carr does not assert this rewiring ideas as fact and even acknowledges that his perspective may be flawed like others have been in the past. In qualifying his point, Carr draws attention back to the fact that his article is more of an opinion piece than an empirically justified argument. What do Carr and Foreman mean by Pancake people and how are we spread wide and thin by a greater quantity of information?
It was very clear within the first few sentences what he was going to be discussing throughout the remainder of his article.
He used specific anecdotes to represent this shift in thinking due to the introduction of new technology that he was talking about. I especially enjoyed the one about Friedrich Nietzsche, who, with the help of a typewriter, was able to continue writing even though his eyes were beginning to fail him, and his writing then changed because of this new invention. I also thought that his example of the clock, as an invention that really shaped how we thought about the world was a really good example.
This helped make the point that something seemingly so small a clock could have such an important impact on how we think. As the clock represents our sense of time, the internet has become something that influences our thought processes, reading abilities, research techniques, and so much more. And as we as a society grew more and more dependent on the clock to make choices i. Carr also did a really good job of balancing science and anecdotal evidence, I thought.
The anecdotes he used were not strictly experiential, either. The combination of both types of evidence was something I found to be quite powerful.
His argument was very solid and I liked how he used examples from different time periods as well as his own personal experiences. Carr could feel that his brain was being reprogrammed because suddenly things he could do easily, such as read books or long articles, suddenly became more difficult and he had a hard time concentrating. When talking to his friends, most of whom loved to read, he found that they were experiencing the same change in their abilities.
He relates back to his argument by stating that our brains have been accustomed to the way the internet, especially Google, makes finding information easier and that humans have become more used to skimming or just reading the summary. Because of the change in our brains, humans are losing the ability to make connections or interpret literature since we are surrounded by distractions, the internet being the main culprit.
The clock made decisions for us, such as when we were supposed to eat, sleep, wake up, etc. A simple, yet innovative invention had the ability to shape our brain, so the impact of the internet, which is vast and complex, was drastic. Similar to how the clock affects the decisions we make, the internet is changing the way we think, write, and read.
And it is true. Right away I was able to notice the difficulty I had concentrating on the article.
My mind would wonder, only to have me wrangle it back into concentration again. Carr was able to successfully pull from many different sources, including a shout out to a Tufts Professor herself, and integrate quotes seamlessly to support his argument.